Monday, October 12, 2026

1984 by George Orwell



Highlight the link address to open in YouTube.
https://youtu.be/-_7EFxHD_sU?is=0bq64zrLPWxJbCpi


This video provides a concise overview of George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, exploring how the state of Oceania maintains control through total surveillance and the manipulation of truth.

Key themes and events covered:

The Surveillance State: Life under Big Brother and the telescreens that monitor every action 

The Ministries: The irony of the Ministry of Truth (which fabricates history) and the Ministry of Love (which handles torture)

Rebellion and Control: Winston Smith’s forbidden diary and his relationship with Julia as acts of resistance, followed by the inevitable trap set by O’Brien

The Breaking Point: The horrors of Room 101, where Winston is forced to betray his only remaining loyalty to Julia.

The Overlooked Appendix: The video highlights that most readers skip the Appendix on Newspeak, which is written in the past tense. This suggests that the Party and its language eventually fell, framing the book as a warning rather than a permanent prophecy.

The video concludes by posing a thought-provoking question: in a world where history and memories can be rewritten, would we even notice if the truth were changed?

____________________________________________


Written in 1948, it was way ahead of it's time:
  • A superstate in permanent wars.
  • The ever watching Big Brother.
  • The invention of Thought crime 
  • The invention of Newspeak (inconvenient words disappear from the vocabulary).
  • The invention of Doublethink (2 contradictions at once can be the truth - War is Peace!)
  • The Ministry of Truth (that lies by rewriting history). 
  • The Ministry of Love (that tortures till you believe).
  • The Ministry of Peace (that start wars).
  • 2 + 2  = 5 is the proof you are loyal and a true believer.

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Kopi Luwak - A More Complete Story

 

Question: civet fermented coffee beans?

AI Answer: Civet fermented coffee beans, widely known as Kopi Luwak, are coffee cherries that have been partially digested, fermented, and defecated by the Asian palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus). Proteolytic enzymes in the civet's digestive tract seep into the beans, breaking down proteins and altering the amino acid profile. This natural internal fermentation removes much of the coffee's bitterness, resulting in an ultra-smooth, complex, and earthy cup of coffee with a distinct chocolate-like aroma.

Because of its unusual production method, it remains one of the rarest and most expensive coffees in the world.

Question: Please explain from the view of the coffee plant? Does it increases the reproduction with faster seedlings growth? Or the dung give the seedlings a head start? Or the civets travel to new places without existing coffee plants?
AI Answer: From the biological evolutionary perspective of the coffee plant (Coffea), the Asian palm civet is not a coffee-making machine, but a highly effective evolutionary partner designed to maximize the plant's survival, reproduction, and geographic reach.
When looking through the "eyes" of the coffee plant, the civet's digestive tract acts as a highly specialized nursery and transport vehicle.

1. Does it speed up germination and seedling growth?
Yes, but not through physical damage. Coffee seeds are recalcitrant, meaning they do not undergo a deep sleep or dormancy period; their germination cycle is already induced while they are still inside the fruit. However, the sugary fruit flesh surrounding the seed naturally secretes chemicals that act as germination inhibitors to prevent the seed from sprouting while still attached to the branch.
  • The Gut Trick: When a civet eats the cherry, its stomach acids and proteolytic enzymes rapidly strip away this chemical-laden fruit pulp.
  • The Malting Effect: The warmth and moisture of the civet's gut initiate a process similar to malting. The seed begins its earliest metabolic germination phases inside the animal without the inhibiting pulp.
  • The Result: Once defecated, the seed has a massive head start. It bypasses weeks of slow pulp decay on the forest floor, allowing the seedling to sprout much faster before mold, fungi, or seed predators can destroy it.
2. Does the dung give the seedlings a head start?
Absolutely. Wild coffee plants thrive best in rich, well-draining, and organic soil.
  • Built-in Compost: The civet’s feces act as a concentrated, localized packet of nutrient-rich fertilizer. As the dung breaks down, it releases vital nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium directly around the newly emerged taproot.
  • Microbial Shield: Fresh coffee pulp on the forest floor is highly susceptible to harmful mold and pathogenic fungi (like Aspergillus). The chemical wash inside the civet's stomach reduces the competing microbial load on the bean’s surface. This gives the fragile seedling a sterile, nutrient-boosted pocket of soil to establish a deep root system safely.
3. Do civets travel to new places without existing coffee plants?
This is the coffee plant’s greatest evolutionary victory. Plants are rooted in place, so they rely entirely on mobile animals (frugivores) to conquer new territory.
  • The Ultimate Vector: Civets are agile, free-roaming mammals that travel significant distances every night across forest canopy layers and varied terrains.
  • Colonizing New Lands: As a civet travels away from the "mother plant," it defecates the intact seeds miles away in areas entirely devoid of competing coffee trees.
  • Perfect Placement: Civets instinctively seek out shaded, covered environments to rest and defecate. Shade-grown coffee develops slower, creates more sugars, and produces healthier plants. By dropping seeds under forest canopies, the civet perfectly deposits the coffee plant exactly where its offspring are most likely to flourish.

The Symbiotic Summary
From the plant’s point of view, the sweet red coffee cherry is a bribe. The plant spends energy making a delicious, sugary fruit to entice the civet. In return, the civet strips away the seed's growth inhibitors, "pre-starts" the germination engine, wraps the seed in premium fertilizer, and transports it to a brand-new home.

So please don't drink this coffee, you are interfering with the Coffee Plants' propagation efforts. In fact, you are disturbing Nature!
(Based on a chat with Gemini)

Photos From Our Osaka Trip in 2019

 

Dotonbori, Osaka. 

Go at night. More lights.



Beef, yum.


Osaka Castle. For your Shogun fantasy.



Where's the Translator App when you need it?



Gobbledygook...



Don't forget your breakfast beef Donburi.



Photos From 2018 (USA) and 2019 (Japan)

 I found the photos from 2018 and 2019 on my Google Photo. Here are some of them...



The Icon in New York, from our US trip in the month of August 2018.


At the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum at City Mall, Washington D.C.

Did they actually went to the Moon? 



If those space suits are pressurized at one atmosphere, and the outside is the vacuum of space, would the astronaut look like the Michelin Man?

The bridges of Chicago. Those 2 circular towers are iconic, called Marina City.


The Bean (officially that sculpture is called Cloud Gate). 


I took a "Reverse" selfie using the fully reflective surface of The Bean.


The Holy Land Experience, a theme park in Orlando, Florida. Closed in 2020. I believe that wasn't by divine intervention?


The model of Jerusalem 31 AD.


The Stone Tablets.


If not for them ropes, I might have tried to roll the stone door (Golel in Hebrew) open?


A Sandakan "Foodies Trip" in January 2019. 

If you visit, do not forget to have dinner here. Reservation a week or more ahead is required.



A very small place, usually a 3 table setup, operating on a Chinese Omakase style. You eat what ingredients the chef bought fresh that morning.


Usually, got big prawns...


This one was mine, mine, don't touch it!


Stock up on Ikan Masin.


A September family trip to Japan (mainly Tokyo and Osaka).

Following the internet advice, took the last flight to arrive around at Haneda Airport, sleep inside on the benches (no shoes on the benches). Safe as the police patrol regularly. 

Save 1 night accomodation, but my wife wasn't please though...


The barrels from all the sake breweries.


Tsukiji Market. Your chance to try whale sashimi...


I told you... hands off of mine.


Well, we all know what happened in 2020...

Saturday, October 10, 2026

Zhuangzi's Teachings - Part 2

 





Zhuangzi's teaching on relativity continues from that in the prior post (Zhuangzi's Teachings - Part 1)



The essence of this parable is presented here, taken from Tsai Chih-Chungs book "Zhuangzi Speaks". 

You can do a Google search for the full story. under "Kun-Peng parable by Zhuangzi".



Different persons have different relative perspectives.



Because their perspective is sufficient to serve the purpose in their life.



This parable is the style of Zhuangzi. It illustrates the Laozi's teaching in Chapter 41 of the Daodejing.


This is taken from this book below. The annotations explain more fully the meanings of the short, slightly cryptic verses of Laozi's style.


____________________________________________


In another Tsai Chih-Chung's book called "The Dao Speaks", his comic version about Relative Perspectives are more graphic.








He is more blunt. Perhaps because he's talking about the practice of The Dao.






If you have tried reading these Chinese Classics, you might have found them difficult to decipher. I did. Hence, I bought different translations and even graphic comic version.

Friday, October 09, 2026

How was the year of Qin Shi Huang's Ascension To The Throne Converted To The Western Julian Calendar?

 

To see how Fomenko’s critique applies to a practical example, we can look at the coronation of Qin Shi Huang, the First Emperor of China. 

In standard history textbooks, he formally ascended the throne as the King of the state of Qin in 246 BC (and later unified China as Emperor in 221 BC).

To convert that traditional Chinese record into our modern Julian or Gregorian timeline, standard chronologists use a precise mathematical method—and it is the potential fragility of this exact method that Fomenko exposes in his writings.


1. How the Conversion is Done Traditionally

Ancient Chinese historians did not record dates using a linear, forward-counting calendar (like "the year 246 before Christ"). Instead, they used a combination of two cyclical systems:

  • The Imperial Era Names (Nian Hao): Years were counted relative to the ruler's reign. The Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji) by Sima Qian simply records that Qin Shi Huang took the throne in the "1st Year of King Zheng of Qin".
  • The Sexagenary Cycle (Ganzhi): A continuous 60-year cyclical loop based on matching 10 "Heavenly Stems" with 12 "Earthly Branches". Every single year, month, and day had a specific 60-year cyclical name.

To lock "1st Year of King Zheng" into 246 BC on the Julian calendar, modern historians work backward using astronomical anchors recorded in the texts. 

For example, Chinese court astronomers meticulously logged solar eclipses, planetary alignments, and comets, noting exactly which day of the 60-year cycle they occurred.

By running modern retrocalculations (astronomical software that calculates where the planets and moon were thousands of years ago), scientists look for a physical match to those unique cosmic events. 

Once they find a perfect astronomical match for a recorded eclipse, they hook that specific Chinese 60-year cycle to a definitive Julian year, and the rest of the dynasties are mapped out linearly from there.


2. How Fomenko Critique the Conversion of Chinese Chronology

In his books, Fomenko extends his critique of Scaliger to ancient Chinese history, raising questions about the security of these dates:

  • The "Late Editing" Problem: Fomenko points out that the Shiji (the foundational text detailing Qin Shi Huang's reign) did not survive in an unbroken chain from 246 BC. 
  • The oldest surviving physical copies we have are actually highly edited manuscripts from the Song, Ming, and Qing dynasties (centuries or millennia later). 
  • Fomenko argues that Renaissance-era European Jesuit missionaries (like Matteo Ricci), who traveled to China in the 16th and 17th centuries, actively participated in organizing and editing Chinese chronological records to ensure China’s ancient imperial timelines wouldn't contradict the biblical timeline established by Scaliger.
  • Astronomical Mismatches: Just like his work with the NASA parameters, Fomenko claims that if you take the raw, original descriptions of eclipses and star maps from the oldest available Chinese texts and strip away later "corrections," they frequently do not align with 200–300 BC.
  • He argues that many of these recorded "ancient" eclipses actually map perfectly to celestial events that happened much later, in the Middle Ages (around 1000–1400 AD).
  • The Tyrant Parallel: Fomenko notes with suspicion the sheer narrative convenience of Qin Shi Huang's biography: he is famously known for the "Burning of the Books and Burying of Scholars" in 213 BC. 
  • Fomenko views this as a convenient textual device. If a later historian wanted to invent an ancient timeline and couldn't provide continuous physical records to back it up, inventing a story about an ancient tyrant who "burned all the evidence" provides the perfect excuse for why no documents survived.

Summary

When a textbook tells you Qin Shi Huang took the throne in 246 BC, it is because modern astronomers matched a cyclical Chinese record to a retrocalculated Julian year. 

Fomenko's stance is that this entire layout is an artificial mirror of European medieval history, neatly mapped backward using malleable astronomical descriptions.


Again, do note that the conflicting views are not settled.


(Based on my chat with Gemini).

Joseph Scaliger's Calculation of the Anno Mundi

 

Joseph Justus Scaliger finalized and published his calculation of Anno Mundi (the Year of the World/Date of Creation) in 1583, presenting it in his foundational book Opus de emendatione tempore (Study on the Improvement of Time).
Scaliger calculated that the Creation of the World occurred in 3949 BC.
How He Arrived at 1583 as the Breakthrough Year
Scaliger did not just add up biblical lifespans in a vacuum. He wanted to create a master mathematical timeline that could accurately pin down any calendar era (whether Hebrew, Roman, Egyptian, or Persian).
To do this, in 1583 he synthesized three independent time cycles:
  1. The Solar Cycle (28 years): The time it takes for dates to fall on the exact same days of the week.
  2. The Lunar Metonic Cycle (19 years): The time it takes for moon phases to realign with the calendar year.
  3. The Roman Indiction Cycle (15 years): A medieval tax cycle used in ancient Roman imperial decrees.
By multiplying these three cycles together (28 × 19 × 15), Scaliger created an overarching 7,980-year loop known as the Julian Period. He mathematically worked backward to find the last time all three of these independent cycles started at exactly "Day 1". That master starting point was January 1, 4713 BC.
Once he had this absolute astronomical ruler anchored at 4713 BC, he mapped the biblical genealogies onto it and concluded that Creation (Year 1 Anno Mundi) occurred 764 years into his Julian Period, giving him the precise historical date of 3949 BC.
Connection to Fomenko’s Dissatisfaction With Scaliger
This is exactly the type of historical calculation Fomenko dissects in Volume 1 of History: Fiction or Science?. 
Fomenko's core argument relies heavily on the fact that Scaliger's entire global system - which we still essentially use today - hinges on a very specific mathematical framework invented during that single year of 1583 by a single Renaissance scholar who was attempting to mathematically reconcile highly conflicting ancient scripts.
Nothing has been settled at this time. Perhaps one day in the future?

(Based on my chat with Gemini).